Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2016-0491

“It was confirmed in evidence by Consultant Raciolocis fii ct a) X-rays undertaken on…”

Dated 12 May 2016, from the coroner for Cumbria. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 7 Jul 2016.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated12 May 2016
  2. Deadline7 Jul 2016
  3. Published on judiciary.uk12 May 2016
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in May 2016.
Department of Health and Social CareNamed in the report as “Department of Health”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in May 2016.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— (1) It was confirmed in evidence by Consultant Raciolocis fii ct a) X-rays undertaken on admission to the Accident & Emergency ward at Furness General Hospital are not immediately reviewed by a radiologist, but are assessed by the requesting physician. b) The X-rays are eventually reviewed by a radiologist on a non-urgent basis when capacity in the system permits. In the case of Mrs Pridmore, her x-ray was reviewed on 41" May 2015, 8 days after being taken and 4 days after she had died. c) X-rays are not reviewed sooner by a radiologist due to a shortage of available radiologists within the Trust. (2) It was confirmed in evidence by Consultant Physician ME that a) If Mrs Pridmore’s x-ray had been reviewed by a radiologist on 3 May 2015, it is likely that the rib fractures and associated haemothorax would have been identified and that Mrs Pridmore would have been cared for differently b) on the balance of probabilities, the outcome for Mrs Pridmore would have been the same due to her age and the nature of her injury. However the failure in identifying the fractures denied Mrs Pridmore the opportunity of a more appropriate course of treatment (e.g. pain management and symptom control) and the possibility, all be it remote, of a different outcome (3) It was confirmed in evidence by independent Consultant Radiologist, po iis a) the rib fractures were only discretely visible on the x-ray and would have required a trained radiologist to identify them b) the shortage of radiologists within the Morecambe Bay trust which prevented Mrs Pridmore’s x-ray from being reviewed by a radiologist sooner is reflective of a critical shortage of radiologists in the U.K. c) there are presently approximately 400 vacant consultant radiologist posts unfilled in the U.K. d) the target set yr 3 report entitled “NHS Services, Seven days a Week” (Paper NHS121315) for urgent x-rays of impatients to be completed (including the reporting by a radiologist) within 12 hours is far from being achieved both locally by Morecambe Bay Trust, but also nationally by all Health Trusts. This is due in part to a general increase in the use of scans and x-rays as diagnostic aids, but mainly due to the acute shortage of radiologist who are available and trained to interpret the relevant data accurately and in a timely manner. The Keogh targets whilist intended to become reality by the end of 2016/17 are becoming a more distant ideal than a realistically approaching target. it is probable that current delays on both a local and national basis in obtaining in a timely manner, accurate radiologist reports of x-rays and CT scans taken for diagnostic purposes, creates a foreseeable risk that further deaths may well arise as a consequence. Locally, a review of your procedures with regard to the assessment of x-rays is required and nationally, a review into the implementation of the recommendations of the Keogh report is likely to be necessary.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2016-0491
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use