“No entries were made by the RMN in the medical records specifically commenting upon the…”
Dated 13 Jun 2016, from the coroner for Preston and West Lancashire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Report put online after its 56 daysOrganisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
judiciary.uk put this report online on 12 Mar 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (8 Aug 2016). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated13 Jun 2016
- Deadline8 Aug 2016
- Published on judiciary.uk12 Mar 2017
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Lancashire Care NHS Trust” | Report put online after its 56 daysNo response published on judiciary.uk. judiciary.uk put this report online on 12 Mar 2017, after the 56 days for replies had ended (8 Aug 2016). These dates can’t tell us whether a reply was due before it went online. |
The coroner’s concerns
This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.
— (1) No entries were made by the RMN in the medical records specifically commenting upon the replies to questions in respect of self-harm or suicide, the only significant entries in the medical records on this subject being made by RGNs (2) No entries were made by the RMN after consultations/ACC T reviews with the deceased in the ACC T documentation resulting in no information being available to discipline officers managing Mr Peebles (3) No assessment by an RMN of a patient suffering obviously delusional symptoms on several occasions (4) No reading by the RMN of the ACC T documentation for collateral information necessary to assist in the diagnosis of a delusional disorder (5) RMN relying upon the summary of the ACC T documentation provided to her by the Senior Officer undertaking the ACC T review rather than assessing the documentation for herself to form a view of the information from a mental health perspective (6) RMN formed the view that Mr Peebles was not suffering from any mental health condition without having reviewed the ACC T documentation, discipline documentation or undertaking any mental health assessment prior to informing the deceased of her decision. (7) on referral on 25 May 2013 by and RGN who was concerned about Mr Peebles psychiatric state to two RMNs no record was made in the medical record of any such referral having taken place and no referral or assessment did subsequently take place (8) RMN remains in the clinical post within the trust and does not appear to have undergone any supervision or retraining Coroner's Court, 2 Faraday Court, Faraday Drive, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire, PR2 9NB Tel 01772 703700 | Fax 01772 704422 (9) the attendance at inquest by the healthcare manager without sufficient information to demonstrate that matters had improved, been resolved etera and having heard the suggestions to minimise future deaths by the oo ail consultant forensic psychiatrist who advises at a national level on matters of prisoner safety, effectively responded that that wasn't the way the Trust undertook its assessments (10) the lack of any Trust internal investigation into the death
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2016-0484
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use