Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2016-0466

“At the inquest the evidence showed that the electric armchair had been ordered by the…”

Dated 28 Dec 2016, from the coroner for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 22 Feb 2017.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated28 Dec 2016
  2. Deadline22 Feb 2017
  3. Published on judiciary.uk28 Dec 2016
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Cornwall Partnership Foundation Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in June 2022.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— At the inquest the evidence showed that the electric armchair had been ordered by the Occupational Therapist and delivered by Tremorvah Industries (Mobility) at short/no notice to Mrs Parr’s address on 21 March 2016. No notification was given to the son — who had requested to be present when it was delivered nor to the Occupational Therapist or Kerrier Home Care Ltd who provided the carers who would assist Mrs Parr in using the new chair. This meant there was limited or no opportunity for the family and carers or district nurses to be trained or for appropriate risk assessments to be carried out prior to the use of the new equipment or at the time of the first use. Mrs Parr was at high risk of falling. She was very frail and dependant on the carers for all her needs. She was not able to mobilise alone and required at least one carer to transfer. She would sit in the chair until the carers assisted her. The electric chair was provided on the day before she was found fallen. It appeared that Mrs Parr managed to use the controls to place the electric chair into the standing position while she was sitting in the chair resulting in her falling to the floor. In the days prior to the fall she had become more confused. The District Nurse Manger explained that it was the role of the District Nurses to carry out the Falls Risk Assessment for clients living in the Community at risk of falling. The District Nurses were very dependent on other agencies to inform them of falls or changes to the risk of falls e.g. the delivery of the electric chair or changes in presentation which increase the risk of falls e.g. confusion. In this case the District nurses were not informed of the fall on 21° March from the new electric chair and no requirement for this to be done and so there was a lost opportunity to provide input — which in this case could have been to deactivate the electric armchair while the carers were not present. Although there were informal procedures in place for district nurse notification, there were no formal protocols or procedures in place. There is a high mortality rate of elderly patients who fall and fracture their femur

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2016-0466
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use