Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2016-0211

“being as follows: - 1”

Dated 6 Jun 2016, from the coroner for Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 1 Aug 2016. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated6 Jun 2016
  2. Deadline1 Aug 2016
  3. Published on judiciary.uk6 Jun 2016
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 1 Aug 2016. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

being as follows: - 1. Despite the fact that there had been a clear change in the presentation of Tracey Lynch following the CPA Meeting on the 22"? June and despite the fact that arrangements for discharge were not in place until the 28" September 2015 no final discharge meeting was held, that is despite the fact that the responsible cincer a the care co-ordinator I WN and the deputy manager from Oswald House J had all indicated that they wished for there to be a final discharge meeting. There seemed to be no system in place to ensure that such a meeting would take place and in order to ensure that appropriate management would take place of the discharge to a rehabilitation unit. 2. The evidence was that familiarisation visits would have been of considerable assistance to Miss Lynch in the lead up to her discharge to Oswald House. Despite that being accepted there appeared to be no system in place to ensure that such familiarisation visits would take place. 3. The evidence was tha the mother of Tracey Lynch, had alerted the care co-ordinator and the responsible clinician with her concerns that her daughter’s state of mind was such that unless she was properly and appropriately escorted in the transport from The Harbour to Oswald House that she would attempt to jump from the motor vehicle. Those concerns were not addressed such that on the 28" September when only escorted by the occupational therapist who was driving the vehicle Miss Lynch was able to grab the steering wheel and cause a serious accident on the MSS motorway. Despite the fact that that risk had previously been identified there was no attempt to seek to manage that in an appropriate way. 4. Having been detained by the Police and having then been assessed by Mental Health Practitioners Tracey Lynch was then detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. She was taken from Preston Police Station to The Harbour at Blackpool. She was placed on a different ward and with a different responsible — Without carrying out any form of assessment whatsoever and with only a cursory glance at previous records i immediately rescinded the Section 3 and without any consideration of the change in circumstance and presentation of Miss Lynch arranged for her immediate discharge to Oswald House. The evidence was that the Consultant Psychologist, who had previously been dealing with Miss Lynch attempted to contact but her offer of assistance was refused. Having been detained for a second time there was no assessment and no care programme approach meeting arranged. That appeared to be a serious systems failure.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2016-0211
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use