Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2016-0040

“Level 2 observations were not conducted at the prescribed time intervals and periods of…”

Dated 9 Feb 2016, from the coroner for Leicester City and South Leicestershire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 5 Apr 2016. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated9 Feb 2016
  2. Deadline5 Apr 2016
  3. Published on judiciary.uk9 Feb 2016
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Leicestershire Partnership NHS TrustResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

— 1. Level 2 observations were not conducted at the prescribed time intervals and periods of up to two hours lapsed between observations that should have been conducted every 15 minutes. When observations were conducted they were not always carried out as per the protocol. Assurances have been given at previous inquests that the performing and recording of these observations would be monitored, audited and staff would be trained regarding the importance of such observations. The same assurances were given at Mr. Hughes’ inquest. It therefore appears that changes have not been made or if they have they are not working. Alternatively, changes may occur in the short-term but they are not being maintained and therefore the monitoring and auditing systems, if implemented, appear not to be working. 2. Fluid balance charts were not properly completed. There was no uniformity as to how or when staff would record fluid intake. Some staff would record fluid if they gave Mr. Hughes a drink, Some would record if they witnessed Mr. Hughes drink it. Therefore, the fluid balance charts were rendered meaningless. 3. Patient bedrooms are not fitted with a call bell system. The staff rely on patients being able to leave their bedroom and seek help or be able to shout loudly enough to be heard. Clearly, a patient who is so unwell that they can do neither would not be able to alert staff that assistance was required. 4. The nursing staff who gave evidence were Registered Mental Health Nurses or Health Care Support Workers. The evidence that they gave suggested they may not appreciate the signs and symptoms of a physical problem / illness. One nurse said that he would not. Although it is understood that discussions have taken place regarding the recruitment of 5 Registered General Nurses to supplement the 2 already in post at the Bradgate Unit and address this concern, it is understood that recruitment has not yet occurred and no date for commencement of recruitment could be given.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2016-0040
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use