Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2015-0304

“Immediately prior to his surgery, Mr Quinn’s blood sugar level was measured at 13mmol”

Dated 3 Aug 2015, from the coroner for Berkshire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 28 Sep 2015. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated3 Aug 2015
  2. Deadline28 Sep 2015
  3. Published on judiciary.uk3 Aug 2015
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Royal Berkshire Hospital Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 28 Sep 2015. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

– (1) Immediately prior to his surgery, Mr Quinn’s blood sugar level was measured at 13mmol. This was made known to the treating surgeon and anesthetist who considered it appropriate to proceed with the surgery. It is recognised that raised blood glucose levels in diabetic patients increases the potential risk of infection. In the course of the evidence at the Inquest I heard that the hospitals guidance for acceptable levels of blood glucose levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery was no more than 15mmol. I understand that national guidance recommends a target blood glucose level of 6 to 10mmol with an acceptable level of between 4 and 12 mmol. I heard that other Hospitals Trusts do use a level of up to 15mmol but the root cause analysis report prepared on behalf of the Circle Hospital following Mr Quinn’s death, included a recommendation that the hospital theatre department audit intra-operative blood glucose levels in patients based on a level of below 11mmol. I also heard in evidence that an American publication made reference to risk factors for infection with a pre-operative 1 serum glucose level of greater than 6 to 9 and a post-operative level of 11.1mmol. I also heard that one hospital trust used a figure of 20 as the highest acceptable level and Diabetes Scotland quoted a level of 14mmol. (2) It is clear to me that there is a great deal of confusion about what is an appropriate level for patients such as Mr Quinn and the optimal blood glucose level that should be achieved in patients, diabetic or otherwise, prior to surgery. While I did not find at the Inquest that Mr Quinn’s blood glucose level of 13mmol was a factor in the infection that led to his death, I am nevertheless concerned that the written policy in place at the time does not mirror that of the national guidelines and is also at odds with other published research articles. (3) I am directing this report to you because I understand that the method adopted by Circle Hospital was based on the policy of your Trust which took the lead in these matters. In those circumstances, I would invite the Trust to review its policy to determine whether the current recommended levels are appropriate in light of other current guidelines and evidence based research.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2015-0304
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use