Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2014-0510

“~ (1) The community team had to spend much time making numerous telephone calls to locate…”

Dated 19 Nov 2014, from the coroner for Exeter and Greater Devon. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 14 Jan 2015. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated19 Nov 2014
  2. Deadline14 Jan 2015
  3. Published on judiciary.uk19 Nov 2014
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
NHS Devon Clinical Commissioning GroupNamed in the report as “Devon Clinical Commissioning Group”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 14 Jan 2015. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS EnglandResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in November 2014.

Some responses were published as scans, so their text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

The coroner’s concerns

This report was published as a scan, so its text was read automatically. Check the wording against the original before you quote it.

~ (1) The community team had to spend much time making numerous telephone calls to locate a child psychiatric bed. There was not at the time, and still appears to be no, or no effective bed bureau system to identify spaces. This is wasteful of clinician time, creates inevitable delays and is indicative that there are routinely too few available beds to serve the needs of our child psychiatric patients. (2) Ona previous admission during May 2014 the bed located was in Huntercombe, and George was removed by his father as the bedroam had inadequate furniture, had no bed linen and there was concern the environment was adding to George’s distress. The distance between home and this placement was in excess of 3 hours travel time. (3) On the index admission, George was placed in the Priory Hospital, Southampton, a distance of over 2 hours travelling time from home. This is not an NHS facility and is specifically for “overflow” patients from all across England, many of whom are therefore huge distances from their home, their family, their friends and community support. (4) Due to the distance, the hospital made the decision that family therapy could not take place (although the parents would have engaged if the importance of this was explained) and periods of home leave were extended due to travelling times, rather than in response to clinical need. (5) There was poor attendance at the CPA meeting, and both parents and the community team only “attended” by telephone, which was far from ideal and impacted on the effectiveness of cornmunication between all parties. (6) Having local accessibility where in patient care is required was recognized in the Mental Health Crisis Care Concordat published 18 February 2014 to be important to keep the young person close to home, school and friends and this was also recognized by all the clinicians at inquest to be important and necessary. With current provision of beds this need is not being met, and is impacting on patient care. (7) In this case | consider the distance of the unit directly contributed to the circumstances that led to George’s death.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2014-0510
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use