“are contained within the narrative attached, but in brief 1”
Dated 1 Sep 2014, from the coroner for Inner North London. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
Deadline passedReplies were due by 27 Oct 2014. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.
- Report dated1 Sep 2014
- Deadline27 Oct 2014
- Published on judiciary.uk1 Sep 2014
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Royal Free London NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Royal Free London NHS Trust” | Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 27 Oct 2014. A reply may have been sent and not yet published. |
The coroner’s concerns
are contained within the narrative attached, but in brief 1. The ward where Mr Taylor was being nursed seemed rudderless, operating without clarity of leadership or support. On 21 February, a bank nurse worked alone in the morning, though was joined by another agency nurse at lunch time, with only a senior nurse in the office. On 22 February, the nurse in charge appeared unclear that he had any additional responsibility by virtue of being the nurse in charge, other than to allocate nurses to patients. Despite only three nurses being on duty on 22 February, the nurse in charge took a break at the same time as another nurse. There was a conflict of views among the nurses that day about who had primary care of Mr Taylor. 2. There was no protocol for the loss of notes and drug chart. Attempts by the ward staff to locate these were not prompt, focused or sustained. The notes and chart were later found simply in a drawer on the ward. 3. When Mr Taylor refused to have his blood sugar checked, there seemed no well understood protocol for re-checking or escalation. Immediate provision was not made for the administration of insulin, and a doctor was even told that he was not diabetic. When Mr Taylor became significantly hyperglycaemic on the 22nd, after the administration of the delayed dose of insulin his nurses did not immediately re-check his blood sugar, perform neurological observations or alert medical staff.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2014-0388
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use