Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2013-0354

“1 There was a miscommunication, or misunderstanding, between the control room and the…”

Dated 25 Sep 2013, from the coroner for Oxfordshire. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 20 Nov 2013. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated25 Sep 2013
  2. Deadline20 Nov 2013
  3. Published on judiciary.uk25 Sep 2013
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “South Central Ambulance Service”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 20 Nov 2013. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

5.1 There was a miscommunication, or misunderstanding, between the control room and the ambulance staff as regards to whether they were required to stand down or stand back. 5.2 If they had stood back as instructed then I understand they would have been only a matter of two to three minutes away from the scene as opposed to ten to twelve minutes. In addition to the slight delays in communication between the police and the ambulance control room, this exacerbated a problem. 5.3 It is clearly important that a continual assessment of the patient’s presenting symptoms are relayed to the ambulance crew and how best to deploy resources given the circumstances of any individual case. The evidence at the Inquest was that no such assessment was undertaken. I should make it clear that I found no evidence that an earlier attendance by the ambulance crew would have resulted in a different outcome for Mr Selman who sadly went into cardiac arrest just prior to arriving at the John Radcliffe Hospital and, despite the best efforts of the staff at the hospital, he could not be revived. I would also say that , on behalf of your service, provided me with a helpful report which assisted my inquiry and gave a very open and honest account of his assessment of the circumstances of this case. 6. Action should be taken 6.1 In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your service has the power to take such action. 6.2 Such action should include: (a) reviewing the communication arrangements between the control room and the ambulance staff to ensure that they fully understand the request to stand down as opposed to any request to stand back; NG / ADC / 097089 Page 3 (b) ensuring that staff continually assess the patient’s presenting symptoms to ensure the attendance of appropriate resourced ambulance crew. 7. Your Response 7.1 You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 26 November 2013. I, the Coroner may extend the period. 7.2

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2013-0354
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use