Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2013-0362

“At the conclusion of the inquest, I indicated to the Properly Interested Persons that I…”

Dated 20 Dec 2013, from the coroner for Blackpool and Fylde. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 14 Feb 2014. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated20 Dec 2013
  2. Deadline14 Feb 2014
  3. Published on judiciary.uk20 Dec 2013
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 14 Feb 2014. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

The coroner’s concerns

– At the conclusion of the inquest, I indicated to the Properly Interested Persons that I proposed to write to the Trust by way of a report in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. During the Inquiry, I received written evidence by way of a post incident review th conducted by the Trust into the death of the Deceased. On 19 December 2013 I received oral evidence from on behalf of the Trust and who was the author of the Post Incident Review. I am concerned that the review undertaken was significantly lacking for the following reasons:  CCTV footage shows that at the relevant time the Deceased shows him following another Service User out of the reception area at the hospital. It seems no steps had been taken to speak to that Service User in order to establish if he had been aware that he was a vehicle for the Deceased’s exit from hospital, and if so on what basis.  Further, the oral evidence provided to the inquiry by suggested that the review had not explored whether other service users had left the relevant ward, or the reception area of the hospital in similar circumstances. Having concluded this inquest, I now write to the Trust to confirm that in my view the Trust should take action because:  When Post Incident Reviews are undertaken it is important that they are thorough and comprehensive and that all of the relevant issues are explored prior to recommendations being made arising from that review and the organisation making recommendation for remedial action, if any, to be undertaken.  If such reviews are lacking, there is a risk that an organisation may not appreciate whether a problem is a persistent one, potentially helpful changes to procedures may not be put in place and future deaths may occur which may otherwise have been prevented. I would therefore be obliged if the Trust would write to me in due course to confirm what steps if any the Trust proposes to take to address these concerns. 2

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2013-0362
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use