“Ms Corrigan was undergoing recognised therapy consistent with the national guidelines for…”

The coroner’s concerns

1. Ms Corrigan was undergoing recognised therapy consistent with the national guidelines for a pre-existing hormonal imbalance prior to her detention under the Mental Health Act and was prevented from continuing with it. Ms Corrigan’s Consultant Gynaecologist telephoned the ward and wrote twice to the Responsible Clinician setting out the history and his willingness to continue to treat Ms Corrigan with permission from her treating mental health team and on the second occasion with an alternative plan for treatment under a local NHS gynaecology team. There was no response, and Ms Corrigan was prevented from accessing this therapy. Expert evidence was that this therapy was not contraindicated. None of this was recorded appropriately in the medical records and no rationale given for Ms Corrigan not having the available treatment. 2. Policies and protocols on section 17 Leave granted under the Mental Health Act (Section 17 Leave) were not properly understood by all staff and the required risk assessments were not conducted by appropriately qualified and trained staff. 3. Section 17 Leave forms and the process of recording of the required components for timings and conditions of such leave had been changed by the Trust in May 2023 from a paper system to electronic recording. The new system: a. omitted previously detailed information on the timings and conditions of the leave that included required scrutiny by a qualified mental health nurse. b. Staff then recorded some information on the Bed State document and evidence was this was not the purpose of this document and led to lack of visibility of any patient who had not returned at the specified time. This was not questioned or queried by senior staff. c. Senior management staff gave evidence that they were unaware of the lack of visibility of the conditions for Section 17 leave under the new electronic system of recording and had not been consulted when the changes were being made. This was still the system in place. 4 4. There was a lack of Datix reports for Ms Corrigan accessing Section 17 leave when the leave had been rescinded by the Responsible Clinician. Datix is the incident reporting system utilised within the Trust. There had been no auditing of the new system and senior managers had not been aware that Ms Corrigan had repeatedly accessed unauthorised section 17 leave on multiple occasions prior to her death when they gave evidence at the inquest. 5. Ms Corrigan was absent without leave on multiple occasions and this had been facilitated by staff. There was a lack of scrutiny as to how and why Ms Corrigan was able to access leave that had not been authorised under section 17 Mental Health Act and/or had been rescinded by the Responsible Clinician due to risks of self-harm. On one occasion the Family went and searched for Ms Corrigan and returned her to the ward with reported risks that she was found near to train tracks and where her mother was buried. 6. Ms Corrigan’s risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that: a. They had not been developed in collaboration with her and did not contain: i. Early waring signs and triggers ii. Which mitigations were appropriate iii. Rationale as to why section 17 leaves were granted and/or rescinded b. With accurate risk information of her presentation and deterioration on the ward and with concerns raised by Family which were put in writing to the responsible clinician c. They contained inaccurate information on fire safety that had never been a part of her presentation . It was not understood where this had emanated from. d. That Ms Corrigan had tried to get rid of all her clothes and this was behaviour Ms Corrigan had previously displayed before attempting to end her life. e. That her mental health deteriorated in the days prior to her death and staff were concerned about the risks to herself due to her low mood. Nursing staff instigated the risk protocol such that Ms Corrigan should not have been able to access section 17 leave until reviewed by the multidisciplinary team and there was confusion about the Level of observations that had been put in place for Ms Corrigan on 21 July. Medical records and section 17 leave forms were not amended to ensure that staff could understand that due to her low mood with consequent risks, leave must not take place until a medical review. 7. There were known and ongoing issues with staffing and shift planning. There was an overreliance on preceptorship nurses who the Trust knew according to national and local policy and guidance, could not undertake all the roles required on the mental health ward unsupervised. 8. Preceptorship nurses were left in charge on the mental health ward on the morning of 22 July 2023 and a qualified nurse attended several hours after the commencement of the shift. This was known about and management staff did not check that the arrangements to mitigate this had been facilitated. There was no clear understanding of how and by whom the nurse in charge role was being undertaken. This contributed to Ms Corrigan accessing the community when leave had been removed temporarily by the ward manager the previous evening in accordance with protocol. The medical records were not clearly updated to reflect this, and the Section 17 Leave form had not been updated. 5 9. Expert evidence was that Dialectic Behavioural Therapy can be useful for a patient like Ms Corrigan to attempt to find strategies for learned maladaptive behaviours with complex trauma. Ms Corrigan’s family were encouraged to privately fund intensive psychoanalytical psychotherapy as a mitigation for Ms Corrigan’s significant risk of killing herself. Expert evidence was that this was not a therapy modality which was understood to be appropriate for Ms Corrigan: a. b. c. d. e. f. specifically, to mitigate a significant and immediate risk of her ending her life for a detained patient with her presenting me

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source

judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2026-0290

Added to Minute Book

8 Oct 2026

Reuse

We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0