“(brief summary of matters of concern) Section 4 contains the jury’s findings as revealed…”
Dated 26 May 2026, from the coroner for West Sussex, Brighton and Hove. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 21 Jul 2026.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated26 May 2026
- Deadline21 Jul 2026
- Published on judiciary.uk22 Jun 2026
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in June 2026. |
The coroner’s concerns
(brief summary of matters of concern) Section 4 contains the jury’s findings as revealed in the Record of Inquest. I am concerned that s17 leave is being authorised by staff in ignorance of the leave conditions. In this particular case, the responsible clinician granted leave on the 13th of February 2025, a condition being that Kristian had to test negative for drug use before leave was allowed. On the 15th of February 2025, the nurse in charge granted escorted leave despite Kristian having tested positive for cocaine use. He was unaware of the restrictions on Kristian’s leave. Evidence was heard during the Inquest that this was a frequent problem and I am concerned that nursing staff are unaware of leave conditions and this is not being properly monitored. This runs a risk of future fatalities if leave is being granted inappropriately. I am also concerned that staff are not properly able to deal with cardiac arrests in acute mental health wards. In Kristian’s inquest, evidence was heard that the response to Kristian’s arrest was chaotic and disorganised. Nobody appeared to be in charge, staff were unable to do CPR properly, the 999 call was of a poor standard, there were considerable delays in contacting 999 and the on call doctor and the staff did not have Naloxone training. I had the same issues in an Inquest I did nine months ago in the exact same ward, indeed in the neighbouring room. The fact that the same set of facts have repeated themselves in Kristian’s case leads me to a very real concern that future deaths will happen if action is not taken. 7.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2026-0241
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use