“The inquest heard evidence that there is a significant demand from families with very…”
Dated 26 Mar 2026, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 21 May 2026.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated26 Mar 2026
- Deadline21 May 2026
- Published on judiciary.uk7 Apr 2026
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Department of Health and Social Care | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in April 2026. |
The coroner’s concerns
– 1.The inquest heard evidence that there is a significant demand from families with very young children who would like to get their children into a sleep routine at an early stage. To meet that demand there are now agencies and individuals who seek to meet that demand. However, the inquest was told that there is no statutory regulation of these individuals or of the agencies. Consequently, anyone can set up an agency that purports to offer training and expertise in maternity services. They need not have any formal training or any medical qualification. The courses they offer do not need to be quality assured or meet any minimum standards. 2. Anyone the inquest was told, can attach the term nurse to a word such as night/maternity/ post-natal. The inquest was told that only the term registered nurse is protected and restricted in its use. An individual who has no medical training or formal early years training can offer their services to a family with young children describing themselves as for example a maternity nurse. This can the inquest was told give a misleading impression of their expertise and skill set to a family employing them. A statutory bar on the word nurse being used by anyone other than a registered nurse on the NMC register would avoid this situation from arising. 3.The inquest was told that the promotion of prone sleeping by unqualified individuals describing themselves as maternity nurses and experts in sleeping poses a very significant risk to a young baby. A baby will sleep more deeply in a prone position which is why superficially it can seem to be a solution where a baby sleeps poorly. However, whenever a young baby is placed in such a position it will increase the risk that they will die suddenly and unexpectedly. All health professionals need to be vigilant in continuing to emphasise the national guidance on safe sleeping and be vigilant in flagging up to a family that prone sleeping in a child that cannot independently turn over is not a solution to a poor sleep routine but rather is a factor that increases the risk of a sudden and unexpected death.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2026-0179
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use