Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2026-0145

“(brief summary of matters of concern) On the 28th January 2025: 1) Signs of sepsis where…”

Dated 27 Feb 2026, from the coroner for Essex. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 24 Apr 2026. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated27 Feb 2026
  2. Deadline24 Apr 2026
  3. Published on judiciary.uk18 Mar 2026
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Colchester General HospitalDeadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 24 Apr 2026. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in March 2026.

The coroner’s concerns

(brief summary of matters of concern) On the 28th January 2025: 1) Signs of sepsis where not appropriately recognised and the Sepsis 6 Pathway was not followed. 2) An early Consultant Review was not sought. 3) The later attempt to seek the Consultant's views was hampered by the use of a mobile phone which had poor signal in the operating theatre and crucial information was not fully imparted/understood. 4) The junior doctor did not feel able to challenge the view of the Consultant to discharge nor did they seek to reapproach them with fuller information. 5) An alternative Consultant's opinion was not sought. 6) The Multi Disciplinary Team meeting the following morning did not discuss Mr Fenn's case when it should have.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2026-0145
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use