“The deceased had a long‑standing diagnosis of mixed anxiety and depression and alcohol…”
Dated 6 Feb 2026, from the coroner for Manchester West. Sent to 2 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 3 Apr 2026.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated6 Feb 2026
- Deadline3 Apr 2026
- Published on judiciary.uk11 Feb 2026
- Today27 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Greater Manchester Mental Health” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2026. |
| Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2026. |
The coroner’s concerns
The deceased had a long‑standing diagnosis of mixed anxiety and depression and alcohol dependency. Evidence suggested she may have been suffering from a co‑occurring disorder (formerly “dual diagnosis”), warranting more active treatment, escalation, and a care coordinator. A recovery worker stated that Wigan addiction services receive numerous referrals involving service users with mental health needs requiring a care programme approach. Mental health provision was insufficient for such patients, and addiction services were perceived as an interim holding place for individuals with complex or nuanced needs. Neither the last assessing mental health clinician nor the author of the Rapid Review of Care identified: missed opportunities to appreciate her mental health deterioration the potential for a co‑occurring diagnosis the need for Home-Based Treatment Team referral. At least two family members had raised profound concerns about the deceased’s deteriorating mental state and paranoid behaviour to a Mental Health Team member. These concerns were not passed on to the assessing clinician. Communication was sub-optimal. Evidence suggested a lack of professional curiosity and confirmation bias regarding the cause of relapse—her alcohol misuse was not considered to be a symptom of mental health deterioration. Mental health staff stated that funding issues limit their ability to deploy escalated community care for patients who do not qualify for inpatient assessment or Home-Based Treatment Team referral. There is no mental health equivalent of “hospital at home” . Evidence confirmed a significant incidence of self‑harm or attempted self‑harm shortly after assessment and discharge from the Mental Health Team at Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, including self-discharges due to the challenging A&E environment. The evidence raises implications for: patient safety diagnostic accuracy risk assessment risk management safe discharge appropriate follow‑up.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2026-0064
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use