Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2026-0061

“The first concern is the "unacceptably long wait" for referrals, assessments and…”

Dated 5 Feb 2026, from the coroner for West London. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 2 Apr 2026.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated5 Feb 2026
  2. Deadline2 Apr 2026
  3. Published on judiciary.uk10 Feb 2026
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
West London NHS TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2026.
Department of Health and Social CareNamed in the report as “Department for Health and Social Care”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in February 2026.

The coroner’s concerns

- (1) The first concern is the "unacceptably long wait" for referrals, assessments and diagnoses of ASD and ADHD. The court was told that demand is continuing to outstrip the services ability to cope; services are outsourced to private providers but there are still unacceptable delays. This impacts the provision of care, the provision of appropriate medication, providing the individuals with insight and understanding of their own presentations and the provision of professional support. In Kallum's case this contributed to the factors that caused his death. I am therefore raising this concern with the Minister for the DHSC and the WLNHS Trust 5 (2) The second concern is that the court was told that the "crisis team" gate-keep referrals into their service, notwithstanding that referral requests can often arise from psychiatry liaison and/or the community psychiatric team who have deep knowledge of the patient and have conducted their own detailed assessments. The care planning in Kallum's case advised him to contact the single point of access (who had rejected referral back to the crisis team in the weeks preceeding the death), to present to ED (which he did but was discharged home to remain under the community team). The pathways essentially failed as the crisis team still was able to reject the referral, thus effectively closing down an avenue for ongoing close care and communication as the crisis presentation continued. The Trust's internal report concluded that Kallum should have been assessed in person and probably should have been accepted back by the crisis team, but in court this conclusion was contested by the service manager. His evidence was that the crisis team was not appropriate for Kallum and the community team should continue the care. This re-emphasied the challenges faced by patients seeking crisis care as the Trust's own professionals were not in agreement or working collaboratively to find a safe solution. The situation appears not to have changed in the 12 months following this death. There appears to be no route to access the "half way house" provisions of care unless via the crisis team and so these were not offered or discussed with Kallum or his family who were trying to care for him. I am therefore raising this concern with the WLNHS Trust

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2026-0061
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use