“The evidence disclosed that Mrs Barrett received optimal care following her transfer from…”
Dated 29 Sep 2025, from the coroner for Essex. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 24 Nov 2025.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated29 Sep 2025
- Deadline24 Nov 2025
- Published on judiciary.uk21 Nov 2025
- Today29 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in November 2025. |
The coroner’s concerns
– The evidence disclosed that Mrs Barrett received optimal care following her transfer from Colchester General Hospital acute care to Trinity Ward in the Fryatt Community Hospital. However, serious concerns were raised in evidence by East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) witnesses relating to the impact and consequences of an absence of embedded, dedicated Tissue Viability Nurses (TVNs) and a Tissue Viability Service (TVS) across the two ESNEFT Community Hospital Sites which, together, involve three Wards (including Trinity Ward) with, cumulatively, some 77 patient beds. The Community Hospital Wards are Nurse Practitioner led and based on a GP model but since 2023 have seen the withdrawal of embedded TVNs or a TVS across all Wards. The evidence from both the Colchester General Hospital Matron and the Community Tissue Viability Lead Nurse confirmed that whilst this has been formally recognised as a ‘risk’ - and attempts at mitigation have been attempted - the steps taken have been inadequate. In her evidence the Tissue Viability Lead Nurse confirmed that she had raised and escalated her concerns regarding the change in policy and informed the Court that she had felt it necessary to “block” some transfers of vulnerable patients from the Acute Hospital to the Community Hospital, expressly on the basis that the absence of an embedded TVS gave rise to a serious risk of the deterioration of these frail and vulnerable patients’ pressure ulcers to the extent, she confirmed, that such transfers presented a risk of future deaths. Notwithstanding the ‘blocking’ she has been required to resort to, she made reference to an increase in pressure damage in the Community Hospital Wards in a 2025 three month period compared to the same period in 2024. 6
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0590
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use