Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0564

“The inquest heard evidence that when he was discharged to the care home from the acute…”

Dated 7 Nov 2025, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 2 Jan 2026.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated7 Nov 2025
  2. Deadline2 Jan 2026
  3. Published on judiciary.uk11 Nov 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Bamford Grange Care HomeResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in November 2025.
Stockport NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in November 2025.

The coroner’s concerns

– The inquest heard evidence that when he was discharged to the care home  from the acute hospital that the care home felt that they did not understand  what was required regarding wound care because the care plan regarding  wound care was not clear .The Trust did not have a copy of what information  had been provided. As a consequence of this, there was a lack of clarity  regarding wound management.   The Trust did not the inquest was told have a clear procedure that ensured that there was a clear, effective and documented communication system in relation  to care plans that included wound management.   The home did not have a clear escalation policy for actions to be taken when a  resident arrived, and their staff were unclear how they were being asked to  manage a wound by the hospital. In addition, the documentation surrounding  concerns and attempts to escalate was limited.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0564
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use