“(brief summary of matters of concern) 1”
Dated 29 Sep 2025, from the coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 24 Nov 2025.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated29 Sep 2025
- Deadline24 Nov 2025
- Published on judiciary.uk20 Oct 2025
- Today22 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2025. |
The coroner’s concerns
(brief summary of matters of concern) 1. I am concerned that Naomi was never seen face to face by her care coordinator over the 3 – 4 month period that she was under the care of the CMHT. I heard evidence that the Andover CMHT, in particular, was impacted by a Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 change in the way that primary care networks (PCNs) refer patients to secondary services. Due to Naomi’s GP surgery being within a particular PCN she was referred to the Andover CMHT even though she lived in Four Marks, a 40-50 minute drive from Andover. This is much further than would have been the case had Naomi come under the care of the Winchester CMHT. The Andover CMHT has not been able to arrange as many face to face appointments with care co-ordinators due to the time they would have to spend travelling. Naomi’s care was not referred to the Winchester CMHT originally nor was it transferred from the Andover to the Winchester CMHT after the referral was accepted. 2. I am concerned that within the Andover CMHT the training around risk assessments and the auditing of compliance with risk assessment policy is not adequate. In relation to Naomi I heard evidence that the completion of formal risk assessments was not carried out in accordance with the CMHT policy. I heard evidence that Andover CMHT had undergone risk assessment training at around the time they were involved in Naomi’s care. Despite this no formal risk assessments were completed. In addition I heard that the process for auditing risk assessment compliance had not identified this failure in respect of Naomi’s care. I also heard evidence that the Andover CMHT had requested further training from the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Trust but that this had not taken place. 3. I am concerned that the Andover CMHT do not appear to have considered how to keep a person’s family involved in their care (when there is the appropriate consent to do so) when meetings with the care co-ordinator take place over the phone and not face to face.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0522
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use