Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0500

“The Court heard evidence that a registered nurse working on the Unit at the me of Mr…”

Dated 9 Oct 2025, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 1 organisation or person.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 4 Dec 2025.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated9 Oct 2025
  2. Deadline4 Dec 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk14 Oct 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in October 2025.

The coroner’s concerns

– 1. The Court heard evidence that a registered nurse working on the Unit at the me of Mr Crowther’s death was not up to date with Intermediate Life Support (‘ILS’) training, despite this being termed ‘mandatory’. Having heard evidence from the Trust’s Clinical Excellence Lead for Older Peoples’ Services, I am concerned that instances con nue to arise across the Trust whereby clinical staff are undertaking shi s despite not being up to date with the required level of Life Support training. 2. Whilst the Court heard evidence as to relevant changes made to the Trust’s Observa ons Policy since Mr Crowther’s death, I am concerned that despite having an Electronic Pa ent Records system, there is currently no mechanism in use on the wards for contemporaneous digital recording of observa ons. I am concerned that an ongoing risk of future deaths arises from this posi on, in the view of the poten al for such systems to accurately record mings of observa ons, facilitate trend analysis (par cularly in the context of a deteriora ng pa ent), and reduce the poten al for errors, either arising from incorrect / unclear manual recording of observa ons

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0500
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use