Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0469

“, West Midlands Ambulance Service (‘WMAS’) Clinical Manager Maternity Lead – gave…”

Dated 16 Sep 2025, from the coroner for Birmingham and Solihull. Sent to 8 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated16 Sep 2025
  2. Deadline11 Nov 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk19 Sep 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “West Midlands Ambulance Service”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care BoardNamed in the report as “NHS Birmingham and Solihull ICB”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in September 2025.
NHS Black Country Integrated Care BoardNamed in the report as “NHS Black Country ICB”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS Coventry and Warwickshire Integrated Care BoardNamed in the report as “NHS Coventry and Warwickshire ICB”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care BoardNamed in the report as “NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire ICB”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Integrated Care BoardNamed in the report as “NHS Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin ICB”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Integrated Care BoardNamed in the report as “NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB”Deadline passedNo response published on judiciary.uk so far. The 56-day deadline was 11 Nov 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.
The Association of Ambulance Chief ExecutiveResponse publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in September 2025.

The coroner’s concerns

– 1.           , West Midlands Ambulance Service (‘WMAS’) Clinical Manager  Maternity Lead – gave evidence regarding the findings of WMAS Serious Incident  Investigation. She explained :  a.  At 18:55 on the 06.09.22 the trust received a 999 call for Mohammed’s mother, Mrs  Khan, who was 36 weeks pregnant and it was reported the baby (Mohammed) was  being born feet first.  b.  A category 1 disposition of “Emergency Ambulance Response for Obstetric  Complications” was reached.  c.   At 18:58, the 1st double crewed ambulance (‘DCA’) resource was dispatched and  arrived at 19:07, a further DCA and Operations Manager also attended.  d.  The clinicians in attendance had no prior experience of breech deliveries.  e.  They advised Ms Khan to move from standing to all 4s and this progressed the  delivery a little, visible parts of the baby were indicative of hypoxia and the umbilical  cord was white and non pulsing. They followed a ‘hands off’ approach and sought  advice from the regional trauma desk who advised rapid transfer to hospital and had pre-alerted Birmingham Heartlands Hospital (‘BHH’).   The crew left at 19:20 and arrived at BHH at 19:24. The patient was admitted to  theatre at 19:26 and following Lovsett’s manoeuvre Mohammed was born at 19:27  with no heart rate and no respiratory effort. Although he responded to resuscitation,  he had suffered profound severe hypoxic ischaemic brain damage. 2.  The WMAS investigation concluded that the national, JRCALC guidelines for the clinical  assessment and management of breech birth were not adhered by the paramedics and  regional trauma desk as the clinicians did not appreciate that the delivery was delayed and  that intervention to aid delivery should be attempted. 3.  Whilst the JRCALC guidance has since been updated (October 2023) to be clearer and  provide much better assistance explained that it is not mandatory for paramedics to receive specific training on obstetric emergencies, including breech delivery, either in  their foundation training/education or as part of continuing professional development. 4.  The clinicians who attended Mrs Khan said they would not have felt confident to attempt the techniques advised by JRCALC even if they had realised they were advised. 5. explained that maternity and obstetric care makes up 3 per cent of emergency ambulance responses. 6.  Whilst WMAS have purchased specific training equipment and an online course for  clinicians on the management of obstetric emergencies in response to the findings of the  investigation, resourcing is such that it has not been possible for all paramedics to receive  this additional training e.g. less than a third of paramedics with WMAS have completed the online course. 7. evidence was that in her opinion the absence of any mandatory training on obstetric emergencies was putting lives at risk.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0469
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use