“The hospital accepted that there were failings that contributed to Jason’s death”
Dated 2 Jul 2025, from the coroner for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. Sent to 1 organisation or person.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 27 Aug 2025.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated2 Jul 2025
- Deadline27 Aug 2025
- Published on judiciary.uk15 Jul 2025
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS TrustNamed in the report as “Royal Cornwall Hospital” | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2025. |
The coroner’s concerns
– The hospital accepted that there were failings that contributed to Jason’s death. Measures to address those failings had not been fully implemented at the date of the Inquest. There were no applicable standard operating procedures for worsening patients in the renal unit at the date of Jason’s death and none had been implemented by the date of Inquest. Jason died on 23 March 2024. The inquest was held on 5 June 2025. The court was told that the standard operating procedures are still being drafted in relation to identifying the appropriate pathway for the admission of worsening patients in the renal unit. The clinicians were undecided on applicable processes including whether the emergency department should be the default pathway. The court found on the evidence that moving worsening patients out of the renal unit and onto in-patient facilities is imperative and should be done at the first available opportunity. Such action would reduce the risks of medication and treatment errors and delays such as that which occurred in Jason’s case. Delays due to uncertainties about appropriate pathways raises risks to patients who require the specialist treatment available on in-patient facilities. I note similar concerns have been raised in a previous Regulation 28 Preventing Future Deaths report issued following the death Mr M.R. Jervis, [PFD dated 30.12.2024]. This earlier R28 report noted failings by AMU and other nursing staff to administer antibiotics when clinical observations repeatedly indicated such was required. The Jervis R28 report raised a concern regarding the absence of a digital alert on hospital software, which could have alerted staff to the need to implement sepsis six, including the need to administer antibiotics. It is unclear whether this measure has been introduced and if not, whether a digital alert would have made a difference in Jason’s case.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0336
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use