“The lack of serial nursing observations was a fundamental omission from Finlay’s care”
Dated 20 Jun 2025, from the coroner for Inner North London. Sent to 4 organisations or people.
A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.
The 56-day response deadline
All responses publishedReplies were due by 15 Aug 2025.
Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.
- Report dated20 Jun 2025
- Deadline15 Aug 2025
- Published on judiciary.uk14 Jul 2025
- Today23 Oct 2026
Watch this report
We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.
Responses from each recipient
| Sent to | Response |
|---|---|
| Whittington Health NHS Trust | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2025. |
| Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2025. |
| Royal College of Emergency Medicine | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2025. |
| Royal College of Nursing | Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in July 2025. |
The coroner’s concerns
The lack of serial nursing observations was a fundamental omission from Finlay’s care. I heard at inquest that there have been many improvements in the paediatric emergency department at the Whittington since his death, not least of which has been the addition of more nursing staff. However, a lack of paediatric nursing observations is a subject about which I wrote a PFD report on 13 March 2025 to a different hospital (the Royal Free) following the death of Billie Wicks. I remain concerned on two counts: 2 1. A lack of nursing observations may be a much wider issue than is recognised. In my experience there is nothing about the Whittington and the Royal Free that stands out as unusual. 2. The medical staff at the Whittington did not recognise the lack of nursing observations. • Observations were thought to be acceptable because they were not reported as otherwise, when in fact they were absent. • The discharging doctor decided that, if his final observations were normal Finlay could go home. Those observations were never carried out, but Finlay was nevertheless discharged.
An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.
- Source
- judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0316
- Added to Minute Book
- 8 Oct 2026
- Reuse
- We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.
Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake
Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0
Ask about this report
AISummaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.
Sign in to use