Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0291

“To the Chief Executive, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust 1”

Dated 11 Jun 2025, from the coroner for Manchester South. Sent to 2 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

All responses published

Replies were due by 6 Aug 2025.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk; a reply may have been sent and not yet published.

  1. Report dated11 Jun 2025
  2. Deadline6 Aug 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk18 Jun 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

The coroner’s concerns

– To the Chief Executive, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust 1. Having carefully considered the oral evidence given in court by a range of different clinicians with varying roles and remits, I am concerned that, notwithstanding the work the Trust has undertaken in response to Lila’s death, the Child Sepsis Screening Tool is not yet fully embedded in the minds of those who assess and treat Children and Young People at the Trust; 2. I am concerned that the Trust is yet to fully implement the latest iteration of the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence’s Guideline Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management (NG240 Published 19 March 2024); 3. It is a matter of concern that the Locum Consultant in Emergency Medicine who completed a form indicating Lila was ‘Safe to Transfer’ to the Paediatric Emergency Department did so without undertaking any examination or direct assessment of her. The doctor had previously filed a statement at court indicating he had undertaken a ‘preliminary visual assessment’ of Lila, but accepted in oral evidence that this was not, in fact, the case; 4. I am concerned that no medical record appears to exist of the examination of Lila which was undertaken by the Locum Registrar in Paediatrics which resulted was discharged from hospital. The absence of this key piece of evidence serves to limit the ability of the Trust to derive all possible learning from Lila’s death. To the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care The court heard evidence that, over the course of almost 10 hours in hospital, Lila’s history and details of examinations and assessments undertaken were recorded on a mixture of various analogue and digital systems in operation in different parts of the Trust, leading to a risk of vital clinical information being lost in the system. I am concerned that this, and other hospitals elsewhere in the country, continue to operate with information being stored and shared between professionals in a fragmented and disjointed way.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0291
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use