Minute Book, home
Coroner’s reportPrevention of future deaths · 2025-0154

“Evidence emerged during the inquest that Mr Grieve was under the care of Stoke Talking…”

Dated 19 Mar 2025, from the coroner for Staffordshire. Sent to 3 organisations or people.

A coroner wrote this report after an inquest, to warn the organisations below about a risk of further deaths.

Read the full report on judiciary.uk

How this works

The 56-day response deadline

Deadline passed

Replies were due by 14 May 2025. A reply may have been sent and not yet published.

Organisations that receive a report must reply to the coroner within 56 days, saying what they will do or why they will do nothing. We show whether a response is published on judiciary.uk.

  1. Report dated19 Mar 2025
  2. Deadline14 May 2025
  3. Published on judiciary.uk26 Mar 2025
  4. Today23 Oct 2026

Watch this report

We’ll email you when a response is published on judiciary.uk, or when the 56 days to reply end with none published there yet. Free, and you can stop with one click.

Next we ask your name, then send a link to confirm and create your free account. Already have an account? Sign in

Responses from each recipient

Responses from each recipient
Sent toResponse
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustNamed in the report as “Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust”Response publishedPublished on judiciary.uk in March 2025.
Stoke Talking TherapiesResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.
Crisis Resolution TeamResponse published, not yet matchedA response is published with this report. We haven’t yet matched it to the organisation it’s from, so it may be this one’s.

The coroner’s concerns

– 1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that Mr Grieve was under the care of Stoke Talking Therapies, and had also presented at the Stoke crisis Evolution Team. Both had conducted suicide risk assessments of Mr Grieve. 2. Both assessments, were incorrect, and took account of incorrect information because neither team had access to the others computer system. Stoke Talking Therapies used IAPTUS and Crisis resolution used Lorenzo. There was no way for either team to see the others electronic notes. 3. It was said in evidence, that a member of staff had not carried out a risk assessment properly whoever, nothing had been done to address this 1 and there were no plans to address this. The concern being that staff training needs are not being addressed.

An extract. Read the full report, including the circumstances of the death, on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

Source
judiciary.uk, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, 2025-0154
Added to Minute Book
8 Oct 2026
Reuse
We show short extracts and link to the original. We don’t host the full report.

Something wrong, such as a date or who it was sent to? Report a mistake

Is this report about someone close to you? You can ask us to remove names from our pages.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, judiciary.uk. Open Government Licence v3.0

Ask about this report

AI

Summaries and questions, with page references. Pro and above.

Sign in to use